Saturday, June 20, 2026

Only Joseph Smith Has a Story to Tell

Religion has no plot. Science has no plot. This means that Joseph Smith is the only entry. He, at least, has given us a story with a plot. But is it convincing?

The stories of the garden of Eden and the Flood have always furnished unbelievers with their best ammunition against believers, because they are the easiest to visualize, popularize, and satirize of any Bible accounts. Everyone has seen a garden and been caught in a pouring rain. It requires no effort of imagination for a six-year-old to convert concise and straightforward Sunday-school recitals into the vivid images that will stay with him for the rest of his life. These stories retain the form of the nursery tales they assume in the imaginations of small children, to be defended by grownups who refuse to distinguish between childlike faith and thinking as a child when it is time to "put away childish things." (1Corinthians 13:11).

Joseph Smith gave the world something that nobody else could. That is why Joseph Smith, with nothing going for him and everything going against him, simply could not lose. He told us what the play is all about. If you can come up with a better story than his, more power to you, but up until now no one else has had any story at all to place before us, and no one can. If only for that reason, Joseph's story deserves a hearing.

The Latter-day Saints have four basic Adam stories, those found in the Bible, the book of Moses, the book of Abraham, and the temple—each seen from the point of view of the individual observers who tell the stories. 

The apparently strange and extravagant phenomena described in the scriptures are often correct descriptions of what would have appeared to a person in a particular situation. Noah saw the flood from His point of view. From where he was, "the whole earth" (Genesis 8:9) was covered with water. As far as he could see there was water. After things had quieted down for 150 days and the ark ground to a halt, it was still three months before he could see any mountaintops. But what were conditions in other parts of the world? If Noah knew that, he would not have sent forth messenger birds to explore.

Joseph and Sidney Rigdon had to use metaphors and similes to describe what they saw: "His eyes were as a flame of fire; the hair of his head was white like the pure snow; . . . his voice was as the sound of the rushing of great waters" (D&C 110). There was no fire, no snow, no rushing waters, but that is as near as Joseph Smith and Sidney Ridgon could come to telling us what they experienced when "the veil was taken from [their] minds, and the eyes of [their] understanding were opened" (D&C 110:1)! They were reporting as well as they could what they had seen from a vantage point on which we have never stood.

Before being introduced to his home planet, Abraham is given a view of the cosmos, in the which he is reminded again and again that all distances, directions, and motions are to be measured with respect to his position only. From another position, the picture might well look very different.

Kolob is not described as the center of the universe, but governs only one class of stars: "I have set this one to govern all those which belong to the same order as that upon which thou standest" (Abraham 3:3). Kolob's influence and time governs "all those planets which belong to the same order as that upon which thou standest"—the expression is used for the seventh time (Abraham 3:9).

The creation process as described in the Pearl of Great Price is open ended and ongoing, entailing careful planning based on vast experience, long consultations, models, tests, and even trial runs for a complicated system requiring a vast scale of participation by the creatures concerned. The whole operation is dominated by the overriding principle of love. 

"Worlds without number" had already come into existence and gone their ways: "And as one earth shall pass away, and the heavens thereof even so shall another come; and there is no end to my works, neither to my words" (Moses 1:38).

Consider how it was done: "And the Gods said: We will do everything that we have said, and organize them." (Abraham 4:31). "And the Gods saw that they would be obeyed, and that their plan was good" (Abraham 4:21). "We will end our work, which we have counseled. . . . And thus were their decisions at the time that they counseled among themselves to form the heavens and the earth" (Abraham 5:2-3). 

After the talk they got down to work. "The Gods came down and formed these the generations of the heavens and of the earth, . . . according to all that which they had said . . . before" (Abraham 5:4-5). They worked through agents: "The Gods ordered, saying: Let [such-and-such happen] . . . ; and it was so, even as they ordered" (Abraham 4:9, 11). 

What they ordered was not the completed product, but the process to bring it about, providing a scheme under which life might expand: "Let us prepare the earth to bring forth grass" (Abraham 4:11), not "Let us create grass."

"We will go down, for there is space there, and we will take of these materials, and we will make an earth whereon these may dwell" (Abraham 3:24). Why? "And we will prove them herewith, to see if they will do all things whatsoever the Lord their God shall command them" (Abraham 3:25). What he commands is what will best fulfill the measure of their existence, but they are not forced to do it—they are not automata. Adam and Eve were advised not to eat the fruit but were told at the same time that they were permitted to do so. It was up to them whether they would obey or not. 

Note that all that follows concerning Adam applies to Eve as well.

Abraham 4:11-12 continues: "Let us prepare the earth to bring forth grass.. . . And the Gods organized the earth to bring forth grass from its own seed, . . . yielding fruit [the fruit is the seed], whose seed could only bring forth the same . . . after his kind; and the Gods saw that they were obeyed." Here are levels of independence down to a complete programming by which the "seed could only bring forth the same."

The most important provision of all is, "We will bless them," and "cause them to be fruitful and multiply" (Abraham 4:28). The blessing of everything makes all the difference. This blessing is the whole difference between a play and no play.

After the earth is set up we are shown everything from Adam's point of view. In Genesis 2:5, we are definitely referred to a pre-temporal creation, then (2:8) we see a garden planted, and (2:15) a man put into the garden, where he is wonderfully at home. He can eat of every tree in the garden (2:16). He lives on terms of greatest intimacy with other creatures, naming and classifying them as he takes his place among them (Genesis 2:19-20).

When Adam eats the fruit his eyes are opened—he is a piqqeah, one who sees things as they were not seen before, who sees things which he in another condition could not see. He is in a new ambience. Cast out of the garden, he finds himself in a dry climate and changes his diet from fruit to grains, which he must work hard to cultivate.

The book of Abraham is more specific. After the great cycles of creation come the smaller cycles, starting with a very dry planet followed by a very wet phase (Abraham 5:5-6). Man is formed of the elements of the earth like any other creature, and he lives in a very lush period, a garden, which is, however, reduced to an oasis in an encroaching desert (Abraham 5:7-10). To this limited terrain he is perfectly adapted. It is a paradise. How long does he live there? No one knows, for this was still "after the Lord's time," not ours (Abraham 5:13). It was only when he was forced out of this timeless, changeless paradise that he began to count the hours and days, moving into a hard semi-arid world of thorns, thistles, and briars, where he had to toil and sweat in the heat just to stay alive and lost his old intimacy with the animals (Genesis 3:17-19).

Until Adam underwent that fatal change of habitat, body chemistry, diet, and psyche that went with the Fall, nothing is to be measured in our years, "for . . . the Gods had not appointed unto Adam his reckoning." (Abraham 5:13.) Until then, time is measured from their point of view, not ours.

He plays a surprising number of roles, each with a different persona, a different name, a different environment, a different office and calling: (1) he was Michael, one of the three most intelligent beings present when the earth project was being discussed; (2) he was one of those who monitored the processes, and who came down from time to time to check up on the operation; (3) then he changed his name and nature to live upon the earth, but it was a very different earth from any we know. It had to be a garden place specially prepared for him. (4) When he left that paradise, his nature was changed again, and for the first time he began to reckon the passing of time by our measurements, becoming a short-lived creature subject to death. (5) In this condition, he began to receive instructions from heavenly mentors on how to go about changing his condition and status, entering into a covenant that completely changed his mentality and way of life. "The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit," when "that which is natural" became spiritual (1 Corinthians 15:45-46). The man Adam passes from one state of being to another, and so do we: "as we have borne the image of the earthly, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly" (1 Corinthians 15:49). (6) In time he died and became a spirit being, the head of all his spirit children in the waiting-place, according to common Christian tradition as well as our own. (7) Then he became, after Christ, the first fruits of the resurrection and returned triumphantly to his first and second estates, (8) to go on to glory and eternal lives.

Christianity views man's life on earth as a one-act drama: Adam fell, Christ redeemed us, and that is the story. Before Adam, there was nothing. Science tells us that the drama is pointless, because there is really nothing before or after it. We, on the other hand, see an ongoing epic of many episodes, each one a play in itself—a dispensation.

It is Adam as our own parent who should concern us. When he walks onto the stage, then and only then the play begins. He opens a book and starts calling out names. They are the sons of Adam, who also qualify as sons of God, Adam himself being a son of God. This is the book of remembrance from which many have been blotted out.

Adam becomes Adam, a hominid becomes a man, when he starts keeping a record. What kind of record? A record of his ancestors—the family line that sets him off from all other creatures.

Which takes us back to the issue with which the Adam question began and which has always been the central issue of human paleontology: a matter of definitions. They may seem trivial, secondary, naive—but the experts have never been able to get away from it. Evolution and natural selection were never defined to Darwin's satisfaction. 

Those who study the origin of man begin with the final answers. The ultimate questions that can only be answered after all the returns are in, are the very questions with which Lyell and Hutton and Darwin began their explorations. Our thrilling detective drama begins by telling us who did it and then expects us to wait around with bated breath while the detective brings in the evidence. Today all the specialists are trying to agree on a clear definition for man: when is a hominid a hominid, and how much? 

Do not begrudge existence to creatures that looked like men long, long ago, nor deny them a place in God's affection or even a right to exaltation—for our scriptures allow them such. We should not be overly concerned as to just when they might have lived, for their world is not our world. They have all gone away long before our people ever appeared. God assigned them their proper times and functions, as he has given us ours—a full-time job that admonishes us to remember His words to the overly eager Moses: "For mine own purpose have I made these things. Here is wisdom and it remaineth in me" (Moses 1:31).

And one of the biggest stumbling blocks of science and religion is not knowing how Adam relates to all other beings, earthly and heavenly. But Joseph knew, and His story is God's story, told over and over again on earths just like this one.

To learn more see Hugh Nibley's Before Adam, Old Testament and Related Studies, Chapter 7.

Tuesday, June 9, 2026

But We Have the Book! Antithetical or Proving Contraries

"For he who persists in evil, and is the servant of evil, cannot be made a portion of good so long as he persists in evil, because from the beginning, as we have said, God instituted two kingdoms, and has given to each man the power of becoming a portion of that kingdom to which he shall yield himself to obey" (Quoting Peter in Clement of Rome emphasis added). 

A friend sent me this photo intending its message for me. It meant a lot to me that someone recognized that perhaps I am not too insignificant to teach His words, that God does in fact, work by very small and simple means, to bring about His great and eternal purposes, and that my obtaining and teaching His words come by the power and gifts of God. 

As a result of obtaining His words I have discovered that by utilizing a simple antithetical (an-tih-THEH-tih-kuhl) method, the Lord brings about His eternal purposes, and that one of the greatest witnesses of the Book of Mormon is its use of antithetical dichotomies. 

What does antithetical mean? The term antithetical refers to something that is the direct opposite of, or in sharp contrast with, another thing. It is derived from the word "antithesis," (an-TIH-thuh-sis) which in Greek literally means "setting against."

​When two ideas are antithetical, they are not just different; they are mutually incompatible or fundamentally opposed. For example the Lord's definition of Good is the antithesis of Evil. They are mutually exclusive. As are the consequences-- light/darkness, life/death, more/nothing, happiness/ misery, and righteousness/ wickedness. And He puts us in a situation where we must choose one or the other. It is the freedom to choose that also serves His purpose, for without the freedom to choose one or the other, there can be no accountability for our choice. It is the choosing between the two that is the most important thing we do, and the two ways, Good and Evil, are absolutely essential to God’s plan. We can not only understand that Good is light and Evil is darkness, but we can also experience the darkness by tasting the bitter that we may know to prize the Good.

Babylon, for example, is the antithesis of Zion, as both a place and a people. If Zion is made up of only those who are repenting, then Babylon is made up of those who are not repenting. 

With antithesis there is no middle ground. We can't say that we desire 75% of Zion, but only 25% of Babylon. Nor is it possible to choose mostly good. By design it is one or the other. 

This compare and contrast method helps us more fully experience His truth, His light and His spirit. As Joseph said "by proving contraries, truth is made manifest" (History of the Church, Volume 6, page 428). One truth manifested by Good or Evil, is that both Good and Evil exist. They are not just words in the book, but are very real and very powerful, drawing us towards one or the other. Another truth is that we must choose one or the other, and that we must have the freedom to choose. This may seem contrary to our life experiences because we impose our own or our preferred standards of good or evil, calling them values, thinking that somehow they justify our chosen lifestyles. We do in fact call good evil, and evil good.

Isaiah uses antithesis in his endtime prophecy. In fact his seven part structure is built upon antithesis. 

  1. Ruin (1-5) -- Rebirth (34-3)
  2. Rebellion (6-8) -- Compliance (36-40)
  3. Punishment (9-12) -- Deliverance (41-46)
  4. Humiliation (13-23) -- Exaltation (46-47)
  5. Suffering (24-27) -- Salvation (48-54)
  6. Disloyality (28-31) -- Loyalty (55-59)
  7. Disinheritance (32-33) -- Inheritance (60-66)

Isaiah’s overall theme is also antithetical--destruction or deliverance. Isaiah's endtime prophecy puts us on one side or the other. His detailed description of Zion and Babylon is also antithetical--they cannot exist together. Whatever Zions is, Babylon is not. It is the choice between God and Satan that will determine whether we will become a Zion like people in the place Zion, or whether we will be destroyed in Babylon along with everthing in Babylon--nothing and no one will be left in Babylon. And those who are not repenting when Isaiah’s, Nephi's, and Christ's prophecies are beginning to be fulfilled, regardless of their belief in God, will be destroyed in Babylon. 

By putting the several passages of Isaiah together, we find that those of Israel who repent, who constitute Zion (see Isaiah 1: 27; 59: 20), are also those who return to the place Zion (see Isaiah 35: 10; 51: 11). We are either repenting or we are not repenting. Not turning completely to Christ results in not turning to Christ!

Even Justice and Mercy are antithetical in the sense that we choose, by repenting, to receive His mercy, and we choose, by not repenting, to receive His justice. So even the antithetical choices have antithetical consequences. Another example is that "by the law no flesh is justified; or by the law men are cut off" (2 Nephi 2:5). The antithesis of being cut off is being justified--for "by the Spirit are ye justified" (Moses 6:60). And being justified means we are no longer under the law, but we are under Grace. So can you now see the antithesis of the law and Grace?

The consequences of our choosing Good as opposed to Evil are spelled out in the scriptures, and there are many. 

For example, being found on the one hand or on the other as a result of the Lord's great and marvelous work (1 Nephi 14:7).

Being cut off as a result of the Lord's two-edged sword, His word (D&C 11:2).

Being claimed by either Justice or Mercy (Alma 42:23-24).

Being hewn down and cast into the fire because the fruit is not good (Jacob 5:42;46-47). Or the tree brings for good fruit because of the goodness of the root (Christ), and the good overcomes the evil (Jacob 5:61).

The justice of God divides the wicked from the righteous (1 Nephi 15:30).

And a few others without citation. Repent or do not repent. Receive more of His word until you know His mysteries in full, or receive less until you know nothing. Be recreated or decreated. Choose ye this day whom you will serve. How long will you halt between two opinions? We act or are acted upon. 

These examples offer another dimension of antithesis, which is that we are always repenting, always receiving more and always being recreated. Once we stop, we are actually in reverse going backwards. Note how repenting is linked to all the others, the fruits of our repentance. 

Not only do we see the consequences, but we are exposed to the many and various ways our choices reveal our desires. One being broad, with innumerable behaviors, and the other being narrow, described with clarity and precision--repent! The broad way exposes all the ways we manifest our refusal to repent.

As you search you will begin to see the Lord's use of antithesis to meet His purposes, and the genius of His plan to put before us only two choices and the consequences of our choices, both clearly defined and enumerated in multiple ways. Why? So there can be no excuse on our part. Our choices clearly reveal our desires.

Antithesis is taught frequently in the Book of Mormon, particularly 2 Nephi 2, where Lehi's teachings to his son Jacob are recorded. 

The often misunderstood truth that there must be "an opposition in all things" is the way God accomplishes His purposes, and Lehi explains why. 

Without opposition there would be "no wickedness, neither holiness nor misery, neither good nor bad." 

Keep in mind that Lehi had already told Jacob that "men are instructed sufficiently that they may know good from evil." In other words, for antithesis to serve its purpose, we must know how God defines Good and Evil. Anything short of His definition is not sufficient. Lehi explains why this truth is so critical. He does this in verses 11-14, and because it is part of the instructions we have received that we may know Good from Evil, it is worth our time to search, 'hear' and hearken. We cannot know what Good is without knowing what is Evil.

But to summarize first, without opposition, there would be: 

1. no purpose to our existence, in fact 

2. there would be no purpose for our creation, and

3. God's wisdom would be destroyed. 

Opposition used here has the same meaning as antithetical. The opposites are mutually incompatible. 

Lehi taught that there must be an opposition in all things. 

Not just an opposition in some things, but in all things. This is signicant because without opposition (antithesis):

¹Righteousness could not be brought to pass, neither ²wickedness, neither ³holiness nor ⁴misery, neither ⁵Good nor ⁶Evil. 

Brought to pass signifies the consequences of our choice. Choices without consequences are meaningless. This is why Alma taught of both the law given, and the punishment for breaking the law.

There needs to be a compound in one or there cannot be just one. For example, if there should be one body it must needs remain as dead, having no life neither death, nor corruption nor incorruption, happiness nor misery, neither sense nor insensibility.

Everything comes together in Christ. It is the result of the antithesis, the coming together, where truth is manifested, where the contraries are proved. For example, opposite concepts like Justice and Mercy are expressed through Christ, God's purpose, as a compound in one. They prove His existence. But more than that, His Justice can be the motivation to cause us to desire and choose His mercy. 

By not partaking of the fruit of the tree of good and evil, Adam and Eve would have remained in the garden forever,  knowing no good or evil; no misery or happiness; no sin or righteousness; and we would not be.

Without opposition, the creation of the body would have no purpose in being created. And not only would there be no purpose for life, the wisdom of God and his eternal purposes, and also His power, His mercy, and His justice would be for nothing. We must be moved upon by the one or the other. 

The contraries or opposite truths bring purpose to our existence, to our desires and to our choices, as they serve His purpose to bring to pass the immortality of man. And without one, the other cannot exist.

"And if ye shall say there is ¹no law, 
ye shall also say there is ²no sin. 

If ye shall say there is ²no sin, ye shall also say there is ³no righteousness.

And if there be ³no righteousness 
there be ⁴no happiness. 

And if there be ⁴no righteousness nor happiness there be ⁵no punishment nor misery. 

And ⁶if these things are not 
⁷there is no God. 

And ⁸if there is no God ⁹we are not,
¹⁰neither the earth; for ¹¹there could have been no creation of things, ¹²neither to act nor to be acted upon; 

wherefore, ¹³all things must have vanished away.

And now, my sons, I speak unto you these things for your profit and learning; for there is a God, and he hath created all things, both the heavens and the earth, and all things that in them are, both things to act and things to be acted upon" (2 Nephi 2:11-14 emphasis added).

And being put (actually choosing to be put) between these contraries, we must either act or be acted upon. And the choice is not just between what is defined as Good and Evil, but between what is actually Good and what is actually Evil. It is the choice between the power of Good and the power of Evil, the source of Good and the source of Evil.

I have used the Lord's words in scripture to prove the antithesis of righteousness and wickedness and other contraries, but it also applies to churches, as in there are only two churches, the Church of God and the church of the Devil. But the Book of Mormon describes many churches that are built up by people, and all these churches would be part of the church of the Devil. The Church of God, on the other hand, is His Church because it is built upon His Gospel, upon His truth, upon Him. But any church where it's people are not built upon His Gospel, is not His Church, regardless of the name. 

There is no Christ's Church without Christ's Gospel. Without His gospel, it would be the church of the Devil. It is not the name or the belief in Christ that determines His church. His church is made up of only those who are repenting and have taken upon themselves His name. And everyone belongs either to His church or to the church of the Devil. 

In the endtime scenario, as Isaiah prophesied, our choice will determine either destruction or deliverance, re-creation or de-creation, life or death. 

Hopefully you can see more clearly the Lord's purpose in His use of contraries and how truth is manifested by proving contraries. 

Next: But We Have The Book! More Records